Families' Anguish Over Coastal Degradation Endangering Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.
A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”
The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.