🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to address Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that face all if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.